SEN reform announced

Education Secretary, Michael Gove, has today announced the biggest reform of Special Educational Needs for 30 years.

The reforms will put parents in charge, giving them the power to control personal budgets for their children – meaning they can choose the expert support that is right for their child, instead of local authorities being the sole provider.

The plans will require education, health and social care services to plan services together by law – so when their children are assessed, parents will be assured they will get full provision to address their children’s needs.

Read about the plans here.

Schools – to educate or to equalise?

“The social mobility challenge for school reformers is to educate, not to equalise.”

That is the title of an article on the website of the Centre for Policy Studies written by Kathy Gyngell, a CPS Research Fellow. 

Ms Gyngell describes how using schools to promote social mobility has little effect on social change, despite the great emphasis placed on it by politicians of the main parties.   Asking if education really can improve social mobility, she finds little evidence of success.  Indeed she learns from the statistical analysis of pupil performance by background and GCSE score, published by Chris Cook, the Education Correspondent of the Financial Times, that the ability of the school system to overcome a child’s background, however good the school, is poor.   Mr Cook says that “poor children tend to do badly even when they go to good schools”, which he says “should haunt the dreams of every school reformer”.

Ms Gyngell points out that the government’s own expensive impact assessment showed children in workless households as well as those with single parents, whether teenage or older, had less verbal ability if there were a Sure Start project in their area.

She says this is a lesson that social mobility will only happen when the goal of education is to educate; when positive discrimination is replaced by proper selection on the basis of merit (not money) to selective schools (whether academic, technical, sporting or creative); and when the competition this provokes drives standards up.

You may or may not agree with her, but here’s the link to the full article.

Is this a teacher’s attitude to academic achievement?

The TES has an article today headed:  “Maths – Put the brakes on”, which is all about a teacher trying to get an A level maths student not to try too hard or do too well.   Nobody really seems to know whether it is a spoof or true, but I suspect many of us have come across a teacher who thinks like this at some time or another.

Anyway, it’s worth reading the TES article here,

a piece about it by Toby Young in today’s Telegraph here,

and a blog by a freelance journalist who supports the views in the TES article here.

Longer school days

The Labour Party has said that the school day should be longer to prepare pupils for work, and, said the Shadow Education Secretary,  a longer day would help prevent teenagers joining gangs and would provide them with a quiet place to study.   He went on to announce a review of how the classroom could become more relevant to the modern workplace, which would also address employers’ concerns at the number of school leavers who are ill-prepared for work.

The review is to be led by Barry Sheerman MP, and will take evidence from teachers, parents, businesses and universities and will look at international best practice on how to prepare young people for employment.

Schools Minister, Nick Gibb, agrees that longer school hours could improve pupils’ standards.   He said, “Stephen Twigg is absolutely right to call for longer school days. They can raise standards particularly for those children from the poorest backgrounds.   We welcome his support and look forward to working with him to persuade the teaching unions that they should embrace longer school days.”

So while, like Nick, we probably do agree with Labour’s views on this, we have a sneaking feeling that they think they are still the government as they announce an official review!

Kent to pioneer a new grammar school

Kent County Council is considering opening a new grammar school, which would be the first one for 50 years.  

The Council’s Cabinet Member for Education, Cllr Mike Whiting, has met headteachers of the county’s grammar schools to discuss what will officially be a “satellite” of an existing school.   It is likely to admit 120 pupils each year.

This has been made possible as the Secretary of State for Education recently made provision for the number of grammar school places to be increased in areas which already have grammar schools and if the population has grown.

Meanwhile, the Chancellor of the Exchequer has already said in his autumn statement that there will be twelve new selective free schools, specialising in maths.

 

Conservative Future praise Government’s action on vocational education

Conservative Future have published this article about vocational education and apprenticeships on their website.  

Here’s the link to the article, “A real commitment to skills and high quality vocational education”.

Schools to be given strengthened powers to deal with underperforming teachers

On 13 January, Michael Gove, Secretary of State for Education, announced that the Government would be giving schools more powers to remove underperforming teachers.

He announced that schools will soon find it easier to manage their teachers and help ensure they are performing to the best of their abilities. Ministers have published new arrangements for teacher and head teacher appraisals in maintained schools in England, and for dealing with underperforming teachers.

The new arrangements will come into effect from September 2012 and include:-

* allowing poorly performing teachers to be removed in about a term – the process can currently take a year or more;
* giving schools more freedom over managing their teachers through simpler, less prescriptive appraisal regulations;
* removing the three-hour limit on observing a teacher in the classroom (the so-called “three-hour observation rule”) so that schools have  the flexibility to decide what is appropriate;
* a requirement to assess teachers every year against the new, simpler and sharper Teachers’ Standards – the key skills that teachers need;
* an optional new model policy for schools that deals with both performance and capability issues; and
* scrapping more than 50 pages of unnecessary guidance.

Ministers are also consulting on new proposals to help schools when they recruit new teachers. This will mean that schools will have to pass on information to prospective employers, on request, about whether a teacher is or has been subject to capability procedures. This would help deal with the problem of ‘recycling’ of poor teachers by helping schools make better, more informed decisions when recruiting.

Recent research from the Sutton Trust shows that during one year with a very effective Maths and English teacher, pupils gain 40 per cent more in their learning than they would with a poorly performing teacher.

Michael Gove said: “We have many excellent head teachers and teachers in the country. They do an outstanding job. We want to help them to do their jobs even better.

“These reforms will make it easier for schools to identify and address the training and professional development teachers need to fulfill their potential, and to help their pupils to do the same.

“For far too long schools have been tangled up in complex red tape when dealing with teachers who are struggling. That is why these reforms focus on giving schools the responsibility to deal with this issue fairly and quickly.

“Schools need to be able to dismiss more quickly those teachers who, despite best efforts, do not perform to the expected standard. Future employers also need to know more about the strengths and weaknesses of teachers they are potentially employing.

“Nobody benefits when poor teaching is tolerated. It puts pressure on other teachers and undermines children’s education.”

Russell Hobby, General Secretary at the National Association of Head Teachers (NAHT), said: “After teaching, performance management is one of the most important things that happens in schools, because it’s the way we make sure that teaching keeps getting better.

“Great performance management is a right, not only for the pupils of a school, but for the staff themselves. Everyone deserves to know how they are doing and how they can develop. And this needs to be done out in the open. The revised procedures reflect a large proportion of NAHT’s hopes. They are simple and flexible, firm but fair. A streamlined approach to capability will, on the rare occasions that it is needed, help schools act more decisively in pupils’ interests and reduce the conflict that these actions can generate.”

Brian Lightman, General Secretary at the Association of School and College Leaders (ASCL), said: “ASCL welcomes the clarity of the new teacher appraisal and capability model policy for schools and as such we hope it will be adopted by school governing bodies in maintained schools and academies across the country.

“One of the strengths of the policy is the way in which it clearly separates the appraisal process from any formal capability procedure. This new model policy helpfully clarifies the role of lesson observation for the purposes of appraisal and the use of ‘drop-in’ observations by head teachers and other leaders with responsibility for teaching standards to evaluate the standards of teaching and check that high standards of professional performance are established and maintained. We are also pleased to see the retention of the use of an experienced external adviser for the appraisal of head teachers.”

In his Daily Telegraph blog, Toby Young praised the new arrangements, saying:-

“You wouldn’t tolerate an underperforming surgeon in an operating theatre, or an underperforming midwife at your child’s birth.   Why is it that we tolerate underperforming teachers in the classroom? Teachers themselves know if there’s a colleague who can’t keep control or keep the interest of their class, it affects the whole school.   Children themselves know they are being cheated. Ultimately we owe it to our children. They are in school for 190 days a year. Every moment they spend learning is precious. If a year goes by and they are not being stretched and excited, that blights their life.”

Read Toby Young’s blog here.

Meanwhile, in her Times blog, “At the School Gate”, Sarah Ebner, noting this announcement, agrees that good teachers are so important, affecting a child’s motivation and how much he/she will learn.

What concerns her as much, if not more, is what can be done about poor headteachers.  She mentions the disinclination of Governors to do anything to remove a headteacher because of all the trouble that it would cause, and says that local authorities can do little, and OFSTED tend only to involve themselves in the future of the headteacher if the school is in special measures.

 

Nick Gibb to speak at CES Meeting

We are very pleased that Nick Gibb, MP, Minister of State for Schools, will be speaking to CES members on Tuesday 24th January 2012.

The meeting will be at 6.00pm in Committee Room 20 at the Palace of Westminster, and will last about an hour and a half.

Just a reminder that entry is via the main Visitors’ Entrance, and that it is possible that there will be a queue waiting to go through security, so you should arrive in sufficient time.

We apologise for the very short notice of this announcement because of internet troubles in the last ten days.   We had already contacted members and friends by e-mail about this meeting.

Is Gove moving towards profit-making Free Schools?

According to the Sunday papers, Michael Gove, Secretary of State for Education has indicated that he would back free schools being run for profit, which at the moment is not permitted.

A group of parents in Brandon, Suffolk, is in the process of setting up a free school, and has asked a Swedish company to manage it on their behalf.  If it gets final approval from the Secretary of State, it will open in September 2012.

The company concerned is Internationella Engelska Skolan, or IES, which run twenty schools in Sweden, and is led by Barbara Bergstrom.  The company describes its education philosophy as “tough love”.   Ms Bergstrom says that Mr Gove told her that if the project at Brandon succeeds, he would like to see the company taking on more schools.   He also said that the company should let him know if it experiences barriers against what it is trying to do.

Under present legislation free schools are state funded charitable trusts and legally stopped from making a profit, but there is nothing in the law to prevent a trust paying a company to run the school under a management contract.

Ms Bergstrom described Mr Gove’s attitude as positive towards the idea of her company managing other schools.   She told him the bureaucratic process is ridiculous and needs to be changed.   She can’t understand why “profit” is regarded as an ugly word in Britain, saying that she started her company twenty years ago and without a reasonable amount of profit she would not have been able to expand.

Mr Gove is in favour of a change in the law to allow schools to be run as commercial enterprises, bringing capital and expertise into the state sector, but Liberal Democrats in the coalition have opposed any change.

Mary Bousted, general secretary of the Association of Teachers and Lecturers,  said last week: “What we are seeing now is schools being run for profit. The  secretary of state said definitely this would not happen. This is going  beyond acceptable boundaries for private firms, like providing books. When  you get a private company running schools, all the dangers of privatisation  of the system become apparent.”

This comment shows how right Ms Bergstrom is.   What is so dangerous?

Happy Christmas

Happy Christmas from the Conservative Education Society.

Have a good break and a peaceful New Year.

Toby Young says Private Schools should not be abolished

Last night the Oxford Union debated the motion, “This House would Abolish Private Schools”.

As usual, there was an impressive list of speakers.   Kevin Brennan MP, the Shadow Schools Minister;  James Westhead of Teach First;  and John Brennan, Director of the Centre for Higher Education Research and Information;  spoke for the motion.   Graham Stuart MP, Chairman of the Education Select Committee;  Barnaby Lenon, former Headmaster of Harrow;  and Toby Young, author, journalist and founder of the West London Free School; opposed the motion.

Toby Young’s speech set out the reasons he believes any move to abolish independent schools would fail, and his strong belief in improving the maintained sector through free schools.  Here’s his speech as reported today in his newspaper column.

His down to earth words helped ensure the motion was defeated by a margin of approximately two to one.

 

 

How to provide high quality early years’ education

Ryan Shorthouse, who works for the Social Market Foundation, has an interesting post today on the ConservativeHome website.Profile.ryanshorthouse

He looks at the so-called “riots” which spread to a number of places in the country a few weeks ago, and concludes that the problem is not the state of today’s society, but that we have a small minority of young people unwilling or unable to join it.  “Education is the passport to thrive in modern society”, he says, and goes into some detail about the system as it is today:  its successes and its shortcomings.   On  early years’ education he says:

“Right from the start, in the Foundation Stage profile assessments children have in their reception year, a significant minority do not achieve the expected minimum in each assessment scale.    Still, they march on to the next year.   And the proportion of those failing only swells as children get older.

“It is high-quality pre-school education in the early years of a child’s life which will best prepare all children for success at school from the start. The evidence is conclusive on the effectiveness of formal childcare in improving cognitive development.”

The Social Market Foundation has an idea for childcare loans, which could help build a high-quality, universal pre-school education service.    It is bringing out two reports this autumn looking at childcare affordability and an innovative new funding model for pre-school education.

Read Ryan’s whole article here.

 

 

 

Work starts on autumn/winter programme

The new CES officer team met for the first time yesterday, in a deserted Palace of Westminster, and began putting together what looks like being an exciting autumn/winter programme.   More news on this soon.

AGM elects new Officer Team

The Conservative Education Society Annual General Meeting, held on 13 July, elected a new Officer Team.

Chairman, Robert Pettigrew, was re-elected, and there are three new officers, Phil King, Richard Tyson, and Vernon de Maynard.  This is the full list:-

Chairman:                                          Robert Pettigrew

Vice Chairmen:                                 James McMurray  and  Phil King

Hon Treasurer:                                 Chris Everest

Hon Secretary:                                 Richard Tyson

Newsletter & Website Editor:           Tricia Gurnett

Policy & Research Co-ordinator:     Vernon de Maynard

Our President is The Lord Lingfield, Kt, DL, and the Deputy President is Harry Greenway.  The four Vice Presidents, all previous Chairmen, are Peter Halls-Dickerson, Peter Lewis, Andrew Povey and Tricia Gurnett.

The officers are now working on a new programme for the autumn and winter.

CES AGM and TALK BY THE LORD LINGFIELD

CONSERVATIVE EDUCATION SOCIETY

NEXT EVENT:

ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING

to be held on Wednesday 13th July 2011, at 6.00pm

In Lords Committee Room 3, House of Lords, London SW1 0PW (via main visitors’ entrance to Palace of Westminster)

    After the AGM, our President, The Lord Lingfield Kt DL, will give his annual keynote speech.

Lord Lingfield is perhaps better known as Sir Robert Balchin, and has a distinguished career in education policy and practice.  He was Chairman of the Grant Maintained Schools Trust, chaired a number of party policy groups whilst we were in opposition, and was asked by the Prime Minister to accept a peerage and thereby add to the education team in the House of Lords.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.